WTF?

Dec. 11th, 2005 11:07 pm
hellison: (Default)
[personal profile] hellison
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4514906.stm

The WTF moment being not so much the removal of the painting but the fact that the complaints, from *men* included "Some said the picture would upset women".

Not women complaining.
No, MEN complaining that Ladies would be Upset by a rather vague drawing of MALE FLESH.

OH NOES! Quick quick, I'm hyperventilating at the very THOUGHT, someone loosen my stays and fetch my smelling salts and embroidery! Call for my carriage, I must be taken home before my tiny mind (assuming I have one) collapses entirely!

Seriously, What The Fuck?
Have we slipped back a century or two and no-one told me? Who ARE these men? Why do they still exist? Are they on day release?

PS on an entirely unrelated note, I hope none of you Englanders are on fire or getting smoked out

Date: 2005-12-12 05:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malvino.livejournal.com
It might just be me being cynical, but is there actually any evidence at all that anyone complained, let alone 30 people?

If I was an art gallery that got 30 potential customers a day, trying to sell 'art' at £1200 a pop, in an expensive area of London, I just might have enough time on my hands to think up a way to get some free coverage, and possibly an impulse buy or two from the kind of person who will support anything that apparently outrages someone else, especially if there's censorship involved.

It might be co-incidence that this is also their first exhibition in their spanking new space, after having to move from Bond street... because they were ignored by everyone and had to downsize because couldn't afford the rent anymore.

Date: 2005-12-12 06:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellison.livejournal.com
Never thought of it that way, but you could be right. Nothing like a censorship storm to drum up publicity and getting people to come see what they're not allowed to.

Date: 2005-12-12 07:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesme-01.livejournal.com
Hmm - the Bit plot thickens
Although feeling rather cheated since offending article exhibits NOTHING but ribbage! (And not red ribbed arousers either)

Date: 2005-12-12 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malvino.livejournal.com
It's tempting to go down there with a thick marker and give him a huge stork-on, problem is they'd then be able to claim £1200 from the insurance and get even more publicity. Perhaps I should just go down late at night and draw a cock on the woman (well, on the glass in-front of it) they put in the window to replace mr. floppy.

Date: 2005-12-12 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_unhurt_/
i think you must. and now i'm thinking:

Hermaphroditic porn. Starlets with both organs. You should see the box, beautiful chicks with dicks that put mine to shame.

sorry. too many viewings of 'clerks'.

Date: 2005-12-12 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellison.livejournal.com
It'd probably sell for more ;p

Profile

hellison: (Default)
hellison

May 2017

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 04:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios